Findings off trends inside sexual regularity and you can amount of sexual lovers was basically equivalent when looking at for each questionnaire season separately (eFigure 4 and you can eFigure 5 regarding the Enhance). In the post hoc analyses, a rise in sexual laziness and achieving zero sexual partners certainly dudes are observed in most sociodemographic subgroups yet not certainly gay or bisexual players (sexual inactivity: aOR to possess trend, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.29-1.33; P = 0.05 getting interaction vs heterosexual people; no sexual companion: aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26-step 1.03; P = 0.009 getting communication) (eTable 15 and you may eTable sixteen on the Supplement). Also, brand new ong guys was seen round the subgroups, though fashion don’t disagree because of the sexual direction (eTable 17 regarding the Complement). During the multivariable logistic regression models adjusted to own sociodemographic details, together with alterations in this new proportion married, brand new aORs to your pattern remained mainly exactly like those who work in the key analyses having sexual inactivity, no sexual couples, and weekly or higher sexual passion certainly one of dudes (eTable 18 regarding Enhance). Ler mais
Numerous studies across various cultures have provided empirical support for the assumption that sexual strategies of men and women follow the predictions of sexual selection theory. Women show a higher preference than men for mates who possess resources and are willing and interested in investing in children; men, in contrast, show a higher preference than women for physically attractive and young mates (Kenrick et al., 1994; Li et al., 2002; Brase, 2006; Roney et al., 2006; Buss and Shackelford, 2008; Conroy-Beam et al., 2015). Ler mais
Dois Criativos | © Copyright 2008-2018 Assentec.